EPIDEMIOLOGY AND CONTROL OF PARASITISM IN NOMADIC SITUATIONS IN HIMACHAL PRADESH

K.P. Jithendran and T.K. Bhat
Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Regional Station, Palampur (H.P.) 176 061l


Contents  Next 

INTRODUCTION
Location, geography and climate

The state of Himachal Pradesh is situated south of Jammu and Kashmir, north-east of Punjab, north-west of Haryana and Uttar Pradesh and west of Tibet, between latitude 30o 22' 40'' N and 33o 12' 40'' N and longitude 75o 45' 55'' E and 79o 04' 20'' E with an altitude ranging from 350 m (low valleys) to 6,975 m (snow covered mountains) above mean sea level. Geographically the state is located in the North Western Humid Himalayan Region (NWHHR) comprising Jammu & Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh and 8 hill districts of Uttar Pradesh. It has a total geographical area of 56,673 square kilometers including 9859 square kilometers of permanent pastureland. The climatic conditions vary from hot and sub-humid tropical in southern low tracts, (450-900 m), warm and temperate (900-1800 m), cool and temperate (1900-2400 m) and cold alpine and glacial 2400-4800 m) in the northern and eastern high mountain ranges. The rainfall varies from 350 to 3800 mm per annum with temperature varying from -25oC in January to 42oC in June. The region is well known for its biodiversity (Anonymous, 1985).

Agroclimatic zones
Agroclimatically the state is divided into 4 zones on the basis of topography, rainfall and altitude (Figure 1).
Zone I         Submountainous low hills-subtropical (upto 1,100 m)
Zone II        Mid hills-subhumid (1,100- < 2,000 m)
Zone III       High hills temperate wet (2,000- < 3,000 m)
Zone IV       High hills temperate dry (> 3,000 m)

Livestock and wild animals
About 92 % population in Himachal Pradesh is rural and depends directly on agriculture, horticulture and animal husbandry (Anonymous, 1994). The rearing of livestock is an integral component of the economy of the state providing source of livelihood to most of the people, especially those inhabiting the border districts of Lahaul-Spiti, Kinnaur, Pangi and Bharmour sub division of Chamba and Bara Bangahal area of Kangra. In the remaining areas, livestock rearing is practiced generally within the framework of mixed farming. The state has a total livestock population of 50.93 lakh constituting 21.9 lakh cattle, 6.2 lakh buffaloes, 10.7 lakh sheep and 11.0 lakh goats and roughly about 1 lakh other animals (equines, mithun, yak, camel, pig, rabbit etc.) excluding poultry against total human population of 51.11 lakh living in 16,807 inhabited villages (Table. 1). Owing to differing climate in the state, it has a variety of wild life. The carnivorous animals include leopard, panther, hyena, ibex, jackal, wild dog, yellow jungle cat, fox, wolf, and marmot. Other animals are sambar, cheetal, barking deer, chausingha, ghural and hog deer. Kastura (musk deer) is found at high altitudes and hares, jungle fowl, peafowl, partridges and quails are plentiful in the lower hills. Kali pheasant is found in the low slopes and monal (snow pheasant), the state bird at high snowy altitudes (Mittoo, 1993).

Migration of livestock in Himachal Pradesh
In Himachal Pradesh, animals are kept in a wide variety of husbandry systems and in different numbers - from a single cow kept for the family to large herds and flocks maintained in a range of systems. Transhumance over long distances, from the Punjab and to the alpine meadows of the inner Himalaya is an established practice although these practices are changing in the contemporary period. Chakravarti (1998), Duffield et al. (1998) and Berkes et al. (1998) give a detailed account of transhumance in the Himalayan pasture (Figure 2). The migration is essentially practiced by people living in mountain locked backward and tribal areas which mainly include Gaddis and Gujjar tribes to find better fodder for the flocks. The traditional sheep and goat rearers called Gaddis are semi-nomadic (rather than nomadic because they combine the seasonal movement of livestock with seasonal cultivation) tribal Hindu group who practice long distance herding of sheep and goats from range to range and their flocks are migratory in nature through well defined routes in Himalayan pasture (Bhasin and Singh, 1995). These animals remain confined to the low plains in zone I and II and border areas of Punjab during the winter season, but migrate to the alpine pasture land (3,000- 4,500 m above m.s.l.) in zone III and zone IV during spring and summer seasons. Shepherds of the snowy ranges are the best description of the Gaddis of the alpine terrain of Himachal Pradesh. The alpine zone is the Gaddis niche. It is a narrow geographical belt running unevenly across the north western Himalaya, with a area of approximately 19,000 km2 in H.P. Although Gaddis keep permanent dwellings in the Kangra valley, the Gujjars are a Muslim buffalo herding community / tribe which follows a system of high pasture use throughout the Himalaya. They are semi-nomadic pastoralists, and have permanent homes where some families remain to tend to crops while other families take the animals to high pastures.


Figure 1. Agroclimatic zones of Himachal Pradesh

Table 1: District wise livestock population in Himachal Pradesh (1992 census)
District
Cattle
Buffalo
Sheep
Goat
Dog
Others
Total
Poultry
Bilaspur
60,461
86,858
24,615
63,472
8,770
1,309
2,45,485
58,844
Chamba
2,38,988
34,832
2,58490
1,75,268
14,730
2,800
7,25,108
67,871
Hamirpur
60,671
94,089
49,498
30,719
8,500
1,783
2,45,260
28,810
Kangra
3,98,558
1,47,386
1,55,432
2,05,024
32,448
10,544
9,49,392
2,42,681
Kinnaur
20,937
3
57,720
28,622
2,182
4,358
1,13,822
5,795
Kullu
1,57,448
670
1,09,835
56,382
9,062
1,379
3,34,778
21,315
Lahul & Spiti
8,910
-
42,766
11,445
205
3,405
66,731
4,923
Mandi
4,30,331
1,07676
1,96,041
2,03,270
14,184
5,155
9,56,657
81,363
Shimla
3,29,055
23,258
1,26,531
95,831
16,469
5,866
5,97,010
45,082
Sirmaur
2,35,557
40,108
27,616
1,15,915
14,850
4,586
4,38,632
39,475
Solan
1,43,491
74,349
19,713
82,541
10,304
3,042
3,33,440
46,167
Una
67,209
91,694
6,088
47,100
13,731
826
2,26,648
21,776
H.P. (Total)
67,51,616
7,00,923
10,74,345
11,15,591
1,45,435
45,053
52,32,963
6,64,039
Source – Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Shimla (Himachal Pradesh), 1994.


Figure 2: Migration routes of transhumant people in Himachal Pradesh [Source: M. Chakravarty-Kaul, 1998]

Epidemiology of parasitic infections in nomadic populations
Nomads are people characterised by or leading a wandering life: pastoral nomads move in search of pasture for their herds; semi-nomads practice unspecialised herding and farming; whilst transhumance is the seasonal moving of livestock to regions of different climate. Depending on the definition employed, there are between 50-100 million nomads in the world mainly in Africa, Middle East, India, and central Asia (Omar, 1992; Macpherson, 1994). Nomadism is a highly specialised mode of life enabling humans to exploit resources that are widely distributed over space and time. Most pastoral nomads maintain a range of livestock divided in separate units capable of utilising all the grass cover in each locality. Livestock species comprise cattle, buffalo, sheep and goats besides yak and other transport animals to increase their efficiency.
        Parasitism is one production problem limiting the animal productivity in these animals and the effect of parasitism may be more in areas of high moisture and rainfall and where permanent pasture situation exists and feral and semi-feral grazing system are practiced. Till seventies, the state of Himachal Pradesh was considered as a disease free zone. This concept emanated from lack of proper diagnostic facilities in the region. The paucity of studies is due to a number of factors including remoteness of some of the areas and lack of infrastructure or trained personnel. The nomad’s isolation and adaptation to harsh ecological conditions prevailing in the region is in fact a hardship post for staff who are often forced to work there. The constant movement of flocks of sheep and goats and their constant interaction with other domestic and wild animals over a large area ranging different states may greatly facilitate the spread of infection among livestock as well as human beings.

Environmental factors
Environmental conditions, especially relative humidity and temperature have a profound effect on the global distribution of parasite species (Hinz, 1986) and would be an important limiting factor for parasitic infections in the environment occupied by most nomadic peoples. The southwest monsoon sets in July and ends in September with the highest rainfall in August. The rise in parasitic load could be attributed to a more favourable temperature, humidity for the development and survival of the pre-parasitic stages (Durie, 1961) leading to increased availability of infective larvae on the pasture during the subsequent months.
        Those parasites with free-living stages (e.g. Giardia spp., Entamoeba spp. and nematodes such as Trichuris spp., Trichostrongyloidea, Strongyloidea, Ascaroidea) are markedly influenced by environmental conditions. Similarly, parasites with numerous freeliving stages, most nematodes and cestodes and those with homothermic intermediate hosts (Sarcocystis, Echinococcus, Taenia spp.) are influenced by environmental climatic conditions. Parasites without free living stages or the requirement of vectors or intermediate hosts for e.g. Trichinella spp. and those parasites with vertical mode of transmission (38 helminth parasites and many protozoans) are more independent of environmental factors. Absence of free living stages removes it from the vicissitudes of the environment and from finding a suitable host at appropriate stage of development. Pregnancy and lactation are discrete, often seasonal phenomena. So there is need for such parasite species to synchronise the larvae for passage at specific times. This is achieved by arrested development and production of offspring when conditions are too extreme, a mechanism known as hypobiosis. This is an important survival strategy for members of the superfamily Trichostrongyloidea and some genera of the superfamily Strongyloidea. Hypobiosis also allows species whose adults have limited life spans for e.g. Toxocara canis, to survive in the hosts for extended periods, and to correlate the resumption of development with parturition or lactation when immunologically naive young are available.

Human behavior in relation to disease transmission
Among the most important factors influencing the transmission of parasitic disease is human behavior. Nomadic pastoralists have the closest possible association with their own ecosystem. The low population density, mobility, eating habits, lack of sanitation, dwelling construction and intimate association with their animals, all have a profound influence on the transmission of parasites.
        Helminths do not as a rule multiply within the host and the number of parasites is a function of the frequency of infection. Ingestion and percutaneous penetration, two major routes of entry of parasites are influenced by behavior of the prospective human host. This may be active, as ingesting soil containing infective stages of Toxocara canis, Ascaris spp., Trichuris spp. or Ancylostoma spp. or permissive, as exposing the skin to water containing penetrative larva of Schistosoma spp or soil containing larvae of Necator spp. or Strongyloides spp. Human and animal cestode infections may result from ingestion of eggs directly from the faeces of definitive hosts or indirectly by contact with definitive hosts or from contaminated food, water, soil or eating utensils.
        There is a close contact of man and animals in the tribal areas of Himachal Pradesh, where domestic animals are kept in basement of the house with human occupants in the first floor of same house. In addition Gaddis (semi-nomadic tribe) also remain in close contact with sheep, goat and dogs throughout the year, exposing them to many animal born diseases of occupational risk. The association of dogs with migratory flock might be playing an important role since they accompany the flock all through the valley and alpine pastures and also feed on dead/offal of slaughtered sheep and goat, though sylvatic cycle cannot be totally ruled out (Jithendran and Rao, 1996). The authors encountered situations, where nomads and butchers use the fluid from big hydatid cysts (potentially hazardous) at the site of slaughter. Snacks made from the whole blood collected from the sheep/goat at the time of slaughter is also a delicacy among the migratory tribes. Their migratory life style is likely to have no access to permanent educational, medical, and veterinary health services. They also may not have safe and sanitary water supplies leading to many zoonotic diseases.
        Risk factors in acquiring parasitic infections during travel to infested areas of the region has been recorded in several instances. Increased thrust on travel tourism and pilgrimage tourism has enhanced the exposure of the public to these infections. Further, the scaling up of infection in tourists living in tents or native dwelling in rural settings and vast number of wild animals in thick belt of forest at high mountains, results in contamination of environment and infections are contracted either through contaminated food or untreated water which is common feature in the hilly regions.

Human diseases in nomadic situations
Table 2 is a summary of the intestinal parasites, found on stool specimen examination, in their order of importance. Some are parasitic zoonoses, which are naturally transmissible from animals to man by various means (Table 3). Zoonoses involving parasites are both common and important, some causing serious diseases of widely varying severity from asymptomatic to fatal. Most of the parasitic zoonoses are acquired through contaminated food and water manifesting in subclinical forms; as a result, it is difficult to visualise the magnitude of the disease problem.

Table 2: Parasites reported from human beings in Palampur area in Himachal Pradesh
_____________________________________________________________________________
Organism                                                     Location                   References
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Protozoa
                Giardia lamblia                        Intestine                     Personal observation
                Entamoeba histolytica              Intestine                    Personal observation
Cestodes
                Taenia spp.                                 Intestine                    Personal observation
                Hymenolepis spp.                       Intestine                     HPKV Annual report, 1991-92
Nematodes
                Ascaris lumbricoides                 Intestine                     HPKV Annual report, 1990-92
                Enterobius vermicularis            Rectum                     Personal observation
                Ancylostoma spp.                       Intestine                    Personal observation
                Trichuris spp.                            Intestine                    Personal observation
_____________________________________________________________________________

        The cystic stage of the tapeworm Echinococcus granulosus is common in sheep, goat, cattle and buffaloes. Hydatidosis due to the larval stages of Echinococcus granulosus is of great public health importance. Primarily, the domestic herbivorous animals serve as intermediate hosts and rarely produce clinical signs despite heavy infection. Hence the metacestode infections are usually diagnosed at necropsy. Based on a survey in abattoir, sheep and goats revealed 4.4 % infection with hydatid cysts with size ranging from 2 to 4 cm and with high percentage (70 %) of viable cysts (Jithendran, 1996). Jithendran and Rao (1996) discussed the role of nomadic flocks in the spread of zoonotic helminthic infections.

Table 3: Directly transmitted zoonoses caused by helminth parasites in Himachal Pradesh
___________________________________________________________
Parasite                         Vertebrate host        Diseases
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cestodes
            Echinococcus          Dog                 Hydatid
Nematodes
            Ancylostoma spp.    Dog                 Cutaneous larva migrans
            Toxocara                Dog                 Visceral larva migrans
___________________________________________________________

        Man is both a final and an intermediate host for Taenia solium, with chances of autoinfection. There are already reports of Cysticercus cellulosae infection in pigs of Kangra valley. However, in areas where villages are not supplied with sanitary facilities, wild pigs come in contact with human excreta. Illegal killing and eating of these animals further perpetuate the life cycle of T. solium. Heavy infection of dogs with fleas and Dipylidium caninum also helps in spreading infection of D. caninum to children, by accidental ingestion of dog flea containing cysticercoid, while playing with dogs. Similarly, observation of Hymenolepis diminuta in rats and man of Kangra area also suggest of zoonosis. Enterobius spp. infection is perhaps the most common helminthic diseases endemic in migratory lifestyle. Cutaneous and visceral larva migrans are also reported among children. Ascarid infections occur occasionally in children who generally, but not exclusively, have been associated with pigs. Cysticercus cellulosae have also been recorded in muscles and heart of pig at Kangra valley. Besides this, protozoan infections of Entamoeba and Giardia spp. are most prevalent in the region.
        The various helminthic infection encountered in dogs of Himachal Pradesh are Toxocara canis, Ancylostoma caninum, Dipylidium caninum and less important filariid heart worm (Dirofilaria immitis) and whip worm (Trichuris vulpis). Infection of Toxocara and Ancylostoma species are of great importance in pups, whereas adults either suffer from acute course or sub latent infection and act as immune carriers contaminating kennels and other surroundings and thus transmitting the diseases in young litters, pet owners and children. Majority of canine helminthic diseases escape early detection due to non-specific symptoms.

Clinical manifestations of parasitic diseases
The most common symptoms of intestinal parasitic infections are constipation or diarrhoea. Diarrhoea may be bloody or purulent. Cramping abdominal pain may be predominant feature in those diseases in which the bowel mucosa or wall is invaded by the parasite, such as hookworms. Heavy infections with Ascaris can result in obstruction of the gut. Patients with tapeworms may be asymptomatic, except for weight loss despite increased appetite and food intake.
        Peripheral blood eosinophelia (15-50 %) is one of the most important markers for parasitic infections. However, the lack of eosinophils in either the blood or body fluids does not preclude the diagnosis of parasitic infections in which eosinophilia is not a common manifestation or the load of the parasites may be very low.

Wild life diseases shared by nomadic pastoralists
Close contact facilitates exchange of many zoonotic diseases (protozoan, entomological and helminthic) and non- zoonotic diseases. Often nomadic pastoralists eat wild animals. Studies on parasitism of wild life are scanty and some of the parasites reported from captive wild and zoo animals is shown in Table 4. Wild animals occur in abundance and diversity, particularly in areas inhabited by nomadic pastoralists. Wild animals increase the number of definitive and intermediate host species, expanding the number parasite’s range over space and time. The occurrence of parasite infections in wild life reservoirs complicates control efforts.

Table 4: Incidence of some gastrointestinal helminth parasites in wild/zoo animals in Himachal Pradesh

__________________________________________________________________________________________
Parasite                        Host                Location     Reference
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Toxascaris leonina        Lion, leopard    Intestine       Kishtwaria et al., 1998
Toxascaris spp.             Lion cub           Intestine       Agnihotri et al., 1998
Toxocara spp.               Lion cub           Intestine       Agnihotri et al., 1998, Kishtwaria et al., 1998
Strongyle spp.               Lion cub           Intestine       Agnihotri et al., 1998
Muellerius capillaris      Deer                Lung            Sharma et al. 1996
Taenia taeniaformis      Leopard/cat      Intestine       IVRI Annual report,1997-98; Jithendran and Somvanshi,1997
Raillietina tetragona     Dove, mynah,    Intestine      Chahota et al., 1997
                                      House sparrow,
                                      Pigeon, parrot
Cotugnia digonopora   Pigeon                Intestine      Chahota et al., 1997
Spirometra spp.           Leopard             Intestine      IVRI Annual report, 1997-98
Ancylostoma spp.         Leopard, lion      Intestine      IVRI Annual report, 1997-98, Kishtwaria et al., 1998
Capillaria hepatica      Monal, rodents    Liver          HPKV Annual report, 1990-91, Chahota et al.,1997
Ascaridia spp.              Monal                 Intestine      HPKV Annual reports, 1990-91
Cyathostoma spp.        Nightingale          Air sac       Chahota et al., 1997
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Table 5: Parasites in dairy cattle and buffaloes in Palampur (Himachal Pradesh)
_____________________________________________________________________________
                                                               No (%) infected*
Parasites                                           1986-1990                                         1993-97
                   Cattle                     Buffalo                Cattle                    Buffalo
                   (n=1552)                (n=530)              (n=1407)              (n=107)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Flukes

Fasciola spp.                    559 (36.0)                258 (48.7)            88 (6.3)            22 (20.6)
Amphistome spp.              257 (16.6)                 81 (15.3)             212 (15.1)        12 (11.2)
Dicrocoelium spp.           177 (11.4)                 99 (18.7)             29 (2.1)             2 (1.9)
Schistosoma spp.             9 (0.6)                      2 (0.4)                  0 (0.0)              0 (0.0)

Cestodes

Moniezia spp.                    45 (2.9)                  15 (2.8)                12 (0.9)            2 (1.9)

Nematodes

Strongyle spp.                487 (31.4)                155 (29.2)            190 (13.5)        17 (15.9)
Strongyloides spp.         142 (9.1)                    22 (4.2)                24 (1.7)            6 (5.6)
Toxocara spp.                69 (3.9)                     24 (4.5)                27 (2.1)            2 (1.9)
Dictyocaulus spp.           30 (1.9)                    3 (0.6)                   9 (0.7)             0 (0.0)
Trichuris spp.                 81 (5.2)                    12 (2.3)                21 (1.6)            0 (0.0)
Capillaria spp.                21 (1.4)                     6 (1.1)                12 (0.9)            0 (0.0)
_______________________________________________________________________________
* Total numbers and total percentage of animals exceed expected values owing to multiple parasitism


Parasite control programme for nomads
Progress in nomadic communities is hindered by lack of adequate epidemiological data on parasitic diseases. The most appropriate, practical and cost effective methods to deliver health and veterinary care to nomadic population and their livestock is still a matter of debate. Mobile and seasonally flexible primary health care and veterinary services matching the needs of specific nomadic populations should be developed, besides seasonal check post for monitoring and surveillance of health aspects at some transit points.

Table 6: Prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in sheep and goats Himachal Pradesh

_____________________________________________________________________
                                                            No (%) infected*
                                                  ------------------------------------
Parasites                                     Sheep            Goat            Overall
                                                    (n=335)         (n=158)      (n=493)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Flukes

Fasciola spp.                            32 (9.6)       14 (8.8)        46 (9.3)
Amphistome spp.                     13 (3.8)         4 (2.5)        17 (3.4)
Dicrocoelium spp.                    24 (7.2)        4 (2.5)        28 (5.7)
Schistosoma spp.                       4 (1.2)        1 (0.6)          5 (1.0)

Cestodes

Moniezia spp.                            9 (2.7)        2 (1.3)         11 (2.2)

Nematodes

Strongyle spp.                        307 (91.6)     158 (100)    465 (94.3)
Strongyloides spp.                    16 (4.8)          8 (5.1)        24 (4.9)
Dictyocaulus spp.                        4 (1.2)         2 (1.3)          6 (1.2)
Trichuris spp.                            48 (14.3)       2 (1.3)        75 (15.2)
_____________________________________________________________________
*Total numbers and total percentage of animals exceed expected values owing to multiple parasitism


        Personal hygiene, respect for good animal husbandry and health practices throughout the production, harvesting and processing of food for human consumption contributes to reducing the risk of transmission to man. Regular dog treatments, strict dog control, a prohibition on the feeding of uncooked offal to dogs and regulation of open slaughter of livestock could prevent most common zoonoses. Increase in numbers of both human and animal has also altered the ecological balance in the region. Hence role of pets, domestic and wild animals in the spread of parasitic zoonoses should be carefully considered in health planning.
        The preparation of herbal medicines remains an important part of healthcare for both human and livestock, especially in rural areas in the state by the traditional migratory communities. The small and subsistence farmers in remote communities and the nomads like Gaddis depend largely on the use of medicinal plants based on indigenous knowledge, in the absence of veterinarians and modern veterinary medicines at high alpine Himalayan pasture land which is considered to be a museum of aromatic and medicinal plants. There is a growing need for identification and development of human and veterinary drugs based on locally available plant resources.

References
Agnihotri, R.K., Kistwaria, R.S. and Mittra, S. (1998). Severe ascarid infection in a lion cub. Abstract submitted in X NCVP, Jabalpur, 4-6 December, 1998. PP. 50-51.

Anonymous. (1985). Himachal Pradesh, brief facts. Directorate of economics and statistics, Shimla, (H.P.).

Anonymous. (1994). Statistical outline, Himachal Pradesh. Directorate of economics and statistics, Shimla, (H.P.).

Berkes, F., Hunt, I.D. and Hunt, K.D. (1998). Diversity of common property resource use and diversity of social interests in the western Indian Himalaya. Mountain Research and Development.,18: 19-33.

Bhasin, V. and Singh, D. (1995). Migration of sheep in Himachal Pradesh-constraints and solutions. Int. J. Anim.Sci., 10: 145-146

Chahota, R., Israni, R.K, Katoch, R.C. and Jithendran, K.P. (1997 b). Hepatic capillariasis in a wild rat (Rattus ratus). J. Vet. Parasitol., 11: 87-90

Chahota, R., Katoch, R.C., Jithendran, K.P. and Israni, R.K. (1997 a). Helminthic infestations among free living fauna around Dhauladhar valley of Himachal Pradesh. Indian J. Anim. Sci., 67: 302-303.

Chakravarty-Kaul, M. (1998). Transhumance and customary pastoral rights in Himachal Pradesh: Claiming the high pastures for Gaddis. Mountain Research and Development., 18: 5-17.

Duffield, C., Gardner, J.S., Berkes, F. and Singh, R.B. (1998). Local knowledge in the assessment of resource sustainability: Case studies in Himachal Pradesh, India and British Columbia, Canada. Mountain Research and Development.,18: 5-17.

Durie, P.H. (1961). Parasitic gastroenteritis of cattle: the distribution and survival of infective strongyle larvae on pasture . Australian J. Agri. Res., 12: 1200-1211.

Hinz, E. (1996). Geometrical aspects of parasitology. In: H. Mehlhorn (Editor) Parasitology In Focus Springer, Berlin.).

HPKV Annual reports (1990-92). Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Palampur (Himachal Pradesh).

IVRI Annual reports (1997-98). Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar (Uttar Pradesh).

Jithendran K.P. and Somvanshi, R (1998). Experimental infection of mice with Taenia taeniaformis eggs from cats-course of infection and pathological studies. Indian J. Exp. Biol., 36: 523-525.

Jithendran, K.P. (1996). Occurrence of hydatidosis and various liver fluke infections In sheep and goats in Kangra valley: An abattoir study. J. Vet Parasitol., 10: 63-67

Jithendran, K.P. and Rao J.R.. (1996). Parasitic zoonoses : Role of migratory sheep and goats in Himachal Pradesh. Hima Paryavaran. 8:6-8.

Katoch, V.C. and Jithendran K.P. (1999). A note on Dirofilaria immitis in a dog. Indian Vet. J., 76:459-460.

Kishtwaria, R.S., Kanwar, M.S. and Nigam, J.M. and Sharma, A.K. (1998). Hind quarter paralysis in lions (Panthera leo). Proceedings of Second Pan Commonwealth Veterinary Conference , Bangalore (India), 22-27, February 1998 (Vol. II) pp. 1266-1267.

Macpherson, C.N.L. (1994). Epidemiology and control of parasites in nomadic situations. Vet. Parasitol. 54: 87-102.

Mittoo, H.K. (1993). Himachal Pradesh. National Book Trust (India). 126 p.

Omar, M.A. (1992). Health care for nomads too please. World Health Forum, 13: 307- 310.

Sharma, A.K., Joshi, V.B., Sharma, M., Katoch, V., Singh, S.P., Katoch, R.C., Batta, M.K. and Asrani, R.K. (1996). Concurrent chlamydial and verminous pneumonia in a barking deer (Munpiacus muntzak). Indian Vet. J., 73: 876-878.


Contents  Next 

This page is a part of ENVIS Bulletin: Himalayan Ecology & Development, Volume 9, No. 1, 2001. In case you have any queries about the page, please contact: Scientist Incharge - ENVIS at GBPIHED, Kosi-Katarmal, Almora 263 643, India.